SOMALI
HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF NORTH AMERICA
MediaWatch
Shantasomali@aol.com
BOSTON, MA
[July 14, 2000]
Democracy,
the West, UN, Djibouti and Somalia
Democracy:
Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg Address simply and directly
expresses how the leader of nation torn apart with civil war
must proceed. Abhorring war, Lincoln, the 16th president of
the United States, nonetheless accepted war as the only means
to save the Union. It might be of special interest to all
those who have shown a concern for Somalia to consider how the
United States, or the free world for that matter, would have
been different if Lincoln had not taken his stance.
Think for a
moment how different the US would have been if Lincoln had not
issued the Emancipation Proclamation on January 1, 1863? Or
ponder how history would have struggled to analyze,
contextualize and understand Lincoln's leadership without his
two-minute speech delivered on November 19, 1863 at a ceremony
dedicating the battlefield at Gettysburg as a National
Cemetery.
The
Gettysburg Address places in context the matters of state that
still define the US and democracy. It also provides an
honorable and well understood backdrop for us to begin
thinking about Somalia and its civil war. Once we reflect on
the Address, we can consider Somalia in a new light.
The
Gettysburg Address: "Four score and seven years ago our
fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation,
conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that
all men are created equal. Now we are engaged in a great civil
war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived
and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great
battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion
of that field, as a final resting place for those who here
gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether
fitting and proper that we should do this."
"But, in
a larger sense, we cannot dedicate -- we cannot consecrate --
we cannot hallow -- this ground. The brave men, living and
dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our
poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor
long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what
they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be
dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought
here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to
be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us --
that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to
that cause for which they gave the last full measure of
devotion -- that we here highly resolve that these dead shall
not have died in vain -- that this nation, under God, shall
have a new birth of freedom -- and that government of the
people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from
the earth."
United
Nations and Djibouti: Now roll the time back, and imagine, if
you will, what the UN and world reactions to the American
civil war would be like. Would Kofi Annan appoint a UN Special
Representative to mediate between Abraham Lincoln and
Jefferson Davis? Would the Special Representative call the
Union or the Confederate States Clan Foxholes populated by
Anglo-Saxons and Negroes? Would the UN Special Representative
ask Gen. Ulysses "Unconditional Surrender" S. Grant
to stop hostilities and vacate Fort Henry and Fort Donelson?
Would the UN Special Representative invite Jefferson Davis,
his Generals and Racist Mobs to bring along members of their
"Civil Society" and form a government in Mexico?
Would the UN Special Representative designate as safe heaven,
Lawrence, Kansas, where pro-Confederate William C. Quantrill
and his followers butchered 182 boys and men? Would the UN
invite those butchers to Mexico? Would the UN and Mexico claim
that if they don't form a government in Mexico City, it could
be the end of the United States of America, as we know it?
Would they?
What is
taking place with the Exiles in Djibouti is not far different
from what you have just imagined. As a matter of fact, on a
scale of 1 to 10, ten being the disaster zone, the Djibouti
and UN Peace Initiative for Somalia is about 8. The United
States Citizens should be very thankful that in 1861, there
was no UNITED NATIONS.
The West, UN,
Djibouti and Somalia: For 21 long years, we Somalis fought
against the repressive socialist dictatorship regime of Siyad
Barre. We won. For ten more years, we fought against the evils
of Mogadishu warlords; and we are about to win. We have lost
almost all material possessions a man can obtain; a
substantial number of our countrymen have perished; but we
have never surrendered; and we will win. How you say?
The victims
of the Siyad Barre regime and of the civil war are leading a
peace process of their own. A peace process that neither the
UN nor Djibouti have contributed. A peace process that is
facing significant political attacks from the UN and Djibouti.
A peace process that the UN and Djibouti can't buy with all
the money and "Khat" in East Africa. A peace process
the west has ignored. A peace process that runs through the
veins of every peace loving Somali. A peace process that will
incrementally go from the "Recovery Zones" to the
"Transitional Zones" and that will finally rest and
find home in the "Crisis Zones." A peace process not
led by war criminals and warlords. A peace process not led by
looters of all existing Somali Historical Treasures. A peace
process not led by looters of Somali properties and embassies
aboard. A peace process not led and financed by commercial
interests of certain Djibouti high rollers and their
collaborators. A peace process not led by a
"bought-and-paid for" so called civil society. A
peace process not led by Siyad Barre nominated Tribal Chiefs
and Elders. A peace process not from the hallucinations of
chewing illegal substances (Khat).
A peace
process that comes with homemade democratic institutions. A
peace process that is not a foreign object. A peace process
led by the Northern Regional Administrations (Somaliland and
Puntland) and supported by the newly established Hiiraan and
Bay-and-Bakool Administrations. A peace process that will be
homemade and as Somali as the Camel's Milk. A peace process
that will bring a lasting peace and prosperity in the Horn of
Africa. A lasting peace that will forever get rid of the
ghosts and burdens of Siyad Barre Generals and Mogadishu
warlords. A lasting peace from the ALMIGHTY, THE BENIFICIENT,
THE MERCIFUL.
As Flag
Officer David Farragut's move up the Mississippi River to take
New Orleans, we encourage the Regional Administrations to
"Damn the torpedoes, full speed ahead!" and form a
union.
And
fittingly, we conclude with Abraham Lincoln's Second Inaugural
Address: " With malice toward none; with charity for all;
with firmness in the right, as God gives us to see the right,
let us strive on to finish the work we are in; to bind up the
nation's wounds; to care for him who shall have borne the
battle, and for his widow, and his orphan--to do all which may
achieve and cherish a just and lasting peace, among ourselves,
and with all nations."
SHASNA*
BOSTON, MA
USA
* SHASNA is
an advocacy group based in Boston, Massachusetts. It stands
for the unity and peaceful coexistence of the Somali people.
It supports the creation of a Federal system of governance to
safeguard the emerging free markets of the Recovery Zones.
SHASNA encourages corporate and individual investments in the
Recovery Zones. It has presence in both Puntland (Boosaaso,
Garoowe, Buurtinle, Bacaadweyn and Gaalkacyo) and Somaliland (Hergeysa,
Berbera and Burco).
Sources:
The collected works of Abraham Lincoln, Vol. VII, edited by
Roy P. Basler.
The White House
BOSTON,
MA E-MAIL: SHANTASOMALI@AOL.COM
|